Home > slashdot > California Spam Law Upheld By Appeals Court

California Spam Law Upheld By Appeals Court

January 19th, 2011 01:18 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

www.sorehands.com writes “In the first California appeals court ruling (pdf), in Hypertouch v. Valueclick, it is ruled that the I-CAN-SPAM Act does not preempt California Business & Professions Code Section 17529.5. California Business & Professions Code Section 17529.5 prohibits the use of falsified headers and subject lines that are likely to mislead recipients. Spammers have been claiming, and some courts have been ruling, that to survive preemption, a Plaintiff has to show all the elements of fraud (false representation, knowledge, reliance, and damage from the reliance.) The reliance and damage from the reliance is difficult as it would essentially require the recipient to buy the penis enlargement pills and show that they don’t work, or to send the money to the Nigerian prince. An ISP could never show reliance and harm, as they are not the recipient and would not be responding to e-mails traversing their systems. The ruling also made it clear that the advertiser is responsible for the acts of their agents, even if their agents promise not to spam.”

Source: California Spam Law Upheld By Appeals Court

Related Articles:

  1. 1st Trial Under California Spam Law Slams Spammer
  2. Federal Appeals Court Tosses Spam Patent
  3. Free Internet Porn Is Legal, Says California Appeals Court
  4. Appeals Court Throws Out Rambus Patent Ruling
  5. US Appeals Court Says Bank Liable For Losses From Poor Online Security
blog comments powered by Disqus