Home > slashdot > Why WikiLeaks Is Unlike the Pentagon Papers

Why WikiLeaks Is Unlike the Pentagon Papers

December 29th, 2010 12:47 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

daveschroeder writes “The recent release of classified State Department cables has often been compared to the Pentagon Papers. Daniel Ellsberg, the US military analyst who leaked the Pentagon Papers, has said he supports WikiLeaks, and sees the issues as similar. Floyd Abrams is the prominent First Amendment attorney and Constitutional law expert who represented the New York Times in the landmark New York Times Co. v. United States (403 U.S. 713 (1971)) Supreme Court case, which allowed the media to publish the Pentagon Papers without fear of government censure. Today, Abrams explains why WikiLeaks is unlike the Pentagon Papers, and how WikiLeaks is negatively impacting journalism protections: “Mr. Ellsberg himself has recently denounced the ‘myth’ of the ‘good’ Pentagon Papers as opposed to the ‘bad’ WikiLeaks. But the real myth is that the two disclosures are the same.”"

Source: Why WikiLeaks Is Unlike the Pentagon Papers

Related Articles:

  1. Pentagon Papers Ellsberg Supports Wikileaks
  2. Daniel Ellsberg On WikiLeaks, Google and Facebook
  3. Pentagon Seeking Out Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange
  4. DoD Study Contradicts Charges Against WikiLeaks
  5. Wikileaks To Publish Remaining Afghan Documents
blog comments powered by Disqus