Home > slashdot > Is the ISS Really Worth $100 Billion?

Is the ISS Really Worth $100 Billion?

November 1st, 2010 11:54 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Ponca City writes “JR Minkel writes on Space.com that as NASA celebrates the 10th anniversary of astronauts living on the space station — and with construction essentially complete — the question remains: will the International Space Station ever really pay off scientifically? The space agency contends that the weightless environment provided by the station offers a unique way of unmasking processes of cell growth and chemistry that are hidden on Earth, but some critics don’t see a zero gravity laboratory as filling a crucial scientific need. Gregory Petsko, a biochemist at Brandeis University, says the only basic science justification he has ever heard for the station is that protein molecules form superior crystals in the microgravity of space than they do on Earth and a best-case scenario, in terms of return on investment, would be if a space-grown crystal were used to design a blockbuster pharmaceutical drug that worked by precisely targeting one of those proteins. Naturally NASA sees things differently. ‘I think those who are naysayers haven’t given us a chance — haven’t given us enough time to show what we can do. We’re just now turning the path to be able to go full force on our science. In the past we had to fit it in around assembly, we didn’t have the facilities available, and the crew was always busy.’”

Source: Is the ISS Really Worth $100 Billion?

Related Articles:

  1. NASA’s Manned Rocket Contract: $4.2 Billion To Boeing, $2.6 Billion To SpaceX
  2. AOL Dumps $1.2 Billion Worth of Acquisitions
  3. NASA Astronauts To Open New Space Station Windows
  4. Earth-buzzing Asteroid Would Be Worth $195B If We Could Catch It
  5. Space Food From Space Farms
blog comments powered by Disqus