Home > slashdot > Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?

Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?

July 10th, 2010 07:16 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Andorin writes “Anyone familiar with the piracy debate knows about the claims from organizations like the RIAA that piracy causes billions of dollars in damages and costs thousands of jobs. Other studies have concluded differently, ranging from finding practically no damages to a newer study that cites ‘up to 20%’ as a more accurate number (PDF). I figure there’s got to be an easier way to do this, so here’s my question: Does anyone know of any creative works that were provably a financial failure due to piracy? The emphasis on ‘provably’ is important, as some form of evidence is necessary. Accurately and precisely quantifying damages from p2p is impossibly hard, of course, but answering questions like this may lead us to a clearer picture of just how harmful file sharing really is. I would think that if piracy does cause some amount of substantial harm, we would see that fact reflected in our creative works, but I’ve never heard of a work that tanked because people shared it online.”

Source: Has Any Creative Work Failed Because of Piracy?

Related Articles:

  1. France Considers ‘Google Tax’ To Pay Creative Work
  2. Research Shows “Three Strikes” Anti-piracy Laws Don’t Work
  3. Does Creative Commons Work With Pseudonymity?
  4. MP Says ‘Failed’ Piracy Warnings Should Escalate To Fines & Jail
  5. Creative Commons To Pass One Billion Licensed Works In 2015
blog comments powered by Disqus