Home > slashdot > The South Carolina Primary and Voting Machine Fraud

The South Carolina Primary and Voting Machine Fraud

June 14th, 2010 06:36 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

cSeattleGameboy writes “South Carolina sure knows how to pick ‘em. Alvin Greene is a broke, unemployed guy who is facing a felony obscenity charge. He made no campaign appearances and raised no money, but he is the brand new Democratic Senate nominee from South Carolina. Tom Schaller at FiveThirtyEight.com does a detailed analysis of how a guy like this wins a primary race, and many of the signs point to voting machine fraud. There seem to have been irregularities on all sides. ‘Dr. Mebane performed second-digit Benford’s law tests on the precinct returns from the Senate race. … If votes are added or subtracted from a candidate’s total, possibly due to error or fraud, Mebane’s test will detect a deviation from this distribution. Results… showed that Rawl’s Election Day vote totals depart from the expected distribution at 90% confidence. In other words, the observed vote pattern for Rawl could be expected to occur only about 10% of the time by chance. … An unusual, non-random pattern in the precinct-level results suggests tampering, or at least machine malfunction, perhaps at the highest level. And Mebane is perhaps the leading expert on this very subject. Along with the anomalies between absentee ballot v. election day ballots…, something smells here.’ Techdirt.com points out that South Carolina uses ES&S voting machines, which have had strings of problems before; and they have no audit trail.”

Source: The South Carolina Primary and Voting Machine Fraud

Related Articles:

  1. Overheated Voting Machine Cast Its Own Votes
  2. Subversives In South Carolina Mostly Safe
  3. Voting Machine Problem Reports Already Rolling In
  4. Social Media Finally Does Something Useful In South Carolina
  5. Subversive Groups Must Now Register In South Carolina
blog comments powered by Disqus