Home > Uncategorized > 1st Trial Under California Spam Law Slams Spammer

1st Trial Under California Spam Law Slams Spammer

March 18th, 2010 03:42 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

www.sorehands.com writes “In the first case brought by a spam recipient to actually go to trial in California, the Superior Court of California held that people who receive false and deceptive spam emails are entitled to liquidated damages of $1,000 per email under California Business & Professions Code Section 17529.5. In the California Superior Court ruling (PDF), Judge Marie S. Weiner made many references to the fact that Defendants used anonymous domain name registration and used unregistered business names in her ruling. This is different from the Gordon case, where one only had to perform a simple whois lookup to identify the sender; here, Defendants used ‘from’ lines of ‘Paid Survey’ and ‘Your Promotion’ with anonymously registered domain names.Judge Weiner’s decision makes it clear that the California law is not preempted by the I CAN-SPAM Act. This has been determined in a few prior cases, including my own. (See http://www.barbieslapp.com/spam for some of those cases.)”

Source: 1st Trial Under California Spam Law Slams Spammer

Related Articles:

  1. California Spam Law Upheld By Appeals Court
  2. Canadian Spammer Fined Over $1 Billion
  3. Judge Orders Piracy Trial To Test IP Address Evidence
  4. To Beat Spam Filters, Look Like A Spammer?
  5. California Judge Routes Campaign Robocalls Through Colorado
blog comments powered by Disqus