Home > slashdot > The Neuroscience of Screwing Up

The Neuroscience of Screwing Up

December 30th, 2009 12:45 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

resistant writes “As the evocative title from Wired magazine implies, Kevin Dunbar of the University of Toronto has taken an in-depth and fascinating look at scientific error, the scientists who cope with it, and sometimes transcend it to find new lines of inquiry. From the article: ‘Dunbar came away from his in vivo studies with an unsettling insight: Science is a deeply frustrating pursuit. Although the researchers were mostly using established techniques, more than 50 percent of their data was unexpected. (In some labs, the figure exceeded 75 percent.) “The scientists had these elaborate theories about what was supposed to happen,” Dunbar says. “But the results kept contradicting their theories. It wasn’t uncommon for someone to spend a month on a project and then just discard all their data because the data didn’t make sense.”‘”

Source: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up

Related Articles:

  1. Accept Defeat: The Neuroscience of Screwing Up
  2. The Phrase That’s Screwing Up the Afghan Air War
  3. Ask Slashdot: DIY Computational Neuroscience?
  4. Bioethicist Jonathan Moreno Talks Jacked-In Soldiers And Military Neuroscience
  5. Open-Source Hardware For Neuroscience
blog comments powered by Disqus