Home > slashdot > The Limits To Skepticism

The Limits To Skepticism

December 12th, 2009 12:32 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

jamie found a long and painstaking piece up at The Economist asking and provisionally answering the question: “Does the spirit of scientific scepticism really require that I remain forever open-minded to denialist humbug until it’s shown to be wrong?” The author, who is not named, spent sevaral hours picking apart the arguments of one Willis Eschenbach, AGW denialist, who on Dec. 8 published what he called the “smoking gun” — it was supposed to prove that the adjustments climate scientists make to historical temperature records are arbitrary to the point of intentional manipulation. The conclusion: “[H]ere’s my solution to this problem: this is why we have peer review. Average guys with websites can do a lot of amazing things. One thing they cannot do is reveal statistical manipulation in climate-change studies that require a PhD in a related field to understand. So for the time being, my response to any and all further ‘smoking gun’ claims begins with: show me the peer-reviewed journal article demonstrating the error here. Otherwise, you’re a crank and this is not a story. And then I’ll probably go ahead and try to investigate the claim and write a blog post about it, because that’s my job. Oh, and by the way: October was the hottest month on record in Darwin, Australia.”

Source: The Limits To Skepticism

Related Articles:

  1. YouTube Threatens To Remove Scientist’s Account Over AIDS Deniers DMCA Claims
  2. YouTube Threatens To Remove Scientist’s Account Over AIDS Deniers’ DMCA Claims
  3. Skepticism Grows Over Claims That MH370 Lies In the Bay of Bengal
  4. Global-Warming Skepticism Hits 6-Year High
  5. Climate Journal Publishes Referees’ Report In Response To “Witch-Hunt” Claims
blog comments powered by Disqus