Home > slashdot > Why Paywalls Are Good, But NYT’s Is Flawed

Why Paywalls Are Good, But NYT’s Is Flawed

March 23rd, 2011 03:21 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

The Media

GMGruman writes “The New York Times has taken a lot of heat for daring to start charging for its product. (What nerve! Imagine if grocery stores, phone companies, or even employees began charging for their wares!) But the problem, InfoWorld columnist Galen Gruman argues, is that its paywall is poorly designed. It encourages unpaid usage in massive quantities via Twitter and other feeds, undermining its very purpose, and it makes multiple-device mobile users — the growing population — pay more than anyone else. Both should be fixed. But the more troubling underlying issue is that the Internet has devalued content nearly to the point where the business reason to create it is disappearing. In mobile, there’s a chance to fix that, but in the way is not just the Web’s free-loader mentality but the pricing of carriers for data transport that take a larger chunk out of people’s budgets than they should, making it that much harder for people to pony up for the value of the content they get through those carriers’ pipes.”

Source: Why Paywalls Are Good, But NYT’s Is Flawed

Related Articles:

  1. The Future Of Paywalls: Microtransactions, Buy-Ins, And Content Wars
  2. NY Times Confident of ‘First Click Free’ Paywalls
  3. The New York Times Paywalls Its Beautiful Mobile Contribution to Democracy in 2012
  4. IEEE Vet: Carriers Capping LTE Services To Avoid Fixed-line Cannibalization
  5. IEEE Vet: Carriers Capping LTE Services To Avoid Fixed-line Cannibalization
blog comments powered by Disqus
YOYOYOOYOYOYO