Apple Smacks Readability In The Face With Subscription Rules; All SaaS In Trouble
We’ve already been over (and over and over and over and over) Apple’s new iOS subscription rules. And the initial backlash has seemingly cooled down as everyone has moved on to the next hot topic of the hour. But it’s pretty clear that this issue is going to keep surfacing, because it really does screw a lot of developers. And sure enough, it’s already back today.
Readability, a service which takes text on the web and strips out ads and other distractions to make posts more readable, had been planning to bring an app to the iOS platform. In fact, they worked with Instapaper creator Marco Arment to build it. It seems like it would be been a pretty popular app. Except it was rejected on the grounds that it circumvents Apples in-app subscriptions today.
Readability details the rejection and their feeling on it on their blog today (which is down at the moment). But let’s just say they’re not happy. The point of Readability is to give the majority of the earnings (70 percent) back to publishers. If Apple is taking a 30 percent cut, the service will either have to cut those payouts to 40 percent, or cut their own take down to 10 percent — neither of which they want to or are willing to do.
The team is angry because they’re not actually selling any content. Instead, they simply offer a service with a monthly fee. In other words, they’re software-as-a-service. And based on what we’re hearing, they’re hardly the only such app getting rejected on the same grounds. But when things like Salesforce apps start getting rejected, will heads really start to roll?
What’s perhaps most crazy about the Readability rejection is that they’re actually a key Apple partner on a piece of their own software: Safari. Last year, Apple decided to build Readability into their web browser. Now they’re rejecting their partner’s app. Nice.
Opinions on this issue vary greatly, but mine is that Apple has every right to implement a subscription service that they want you to use, but there’s no way they can charge a 30 percent fee for many of the services they wish to use it. SaaS is one example, music streaming services are another. At 30 percent, most of these simply could not afford to stay in business. It’s ridiculous. And Apple needs to either wave the fee or cut it down to some low single digit percentage in circumstances beyond traditional media publishers.
So what is Readability going to do? Well for now, they’ll stick to the web. Apple can’t regulate that.
- As Apple Ponders Their Subscription Ruling, Readability Goes Full HTML5
- Readability Readies Apple “Love Letter” — Has The Subscription Policy Already Shifted?
- Apple Rejects Readability’s iOS App Due To Lack Of In-App Subscription Option
- Steve Jobs: New In-App Subscription Policy For Publishing Apps, Not SaaS Apps
- Fly Or Die: Apple’s New Subscription Rules (With Rhapsody President Jon Irwin)