Home > slashdot > Is Wired Hiding Key Evidence On Bradley Manning?

Is Wired Hiding Key Evidence On Bradley Manning?

December 28th, 2010 12:45 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Hugh Pickens writes “Glenn Greenwald writes in Salon that for more than six months, Wired’s Senior Editor Kevin Poulsen has possessed but refuses to publish the key evidence in the arrest of US Army PFC Bradley Manning for allegedly acting as WikiLeaks’ source. “In late May, Adrian Lamo — at the same time he was working with the FBI as a government informant against Manning — gave Poulsen what he purported to be the full chat logs between Manning and Lamo in which the Army Private allegedly confessed to having been the source for the various cables, documents and video which WikiLeaks released throughout this year,” writes Greenwald. Wired has only published about 25% of the logs writes Greenwald and Poulsen’s concealment of the chat logs is actively blinding journalists who have been attempting to learn what Manning did and did not do. “Whether by design or effect, Kevin Poulsen and Wired have played a critical role in concealing the truth from the public about the Manning arrest,” concludes Greenwald. “This has long ago left the realm of mere journalistic failure and stands as one of the most egregious examples of active truth-hiding by a ‘journalist’ I’ve ever seen.”"

Source: Is Wired Hiding Key Evidence On Bradley Manning?

Related Articles:

  1. Wired Responds In Manning Chat Log Controversy
  2. Wired Releases Full Manning/Lamo Chat Logs
  3. WikiLeaks Gives $15k To Bradley Manning Defense
  4. Adrian Lamo Explains His Decision To Expose Bradley Manning
  5. Bradley Manning (WikiLeaks Source) Given Hearing After 2 Years In Jail
blog comments powered by Disqus