Home > slashdot > Supreme Court Refuses P2P “innocent Sharing” Case

Supreme Court Refuses P2P “innocent Sharing” Case

November 30th, 2010 11:50 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

yoyo81 writes “The supreme court has refused to hear an “innocent infringement case” in which Whitney Harper shared some music on the family computer when she was a teenager and was subsequently hit with a lawsuit from the RIAA. An appeals court overturned an earlier ruling from a federal court that reduced damages to $200 instead of the statutory $750 claiming “innocence” was no defense, especially since copyright notices appear on all phonorecords. She appealed to the Supreme Court, which refused to hear her case, but Justice Alito stated, “This provision was adopted in 1988, well before digital music files became available on the Internet” and further, “I would grant review in this case because not many cases presenting this issue are likely to reach the Courts of Appeals.” For now, though, Harper’s verdict remains in place: $750 for each of the 37 songs at issue, or $27,750.”

Source: Supreme Court Refuses P2P “innocent Sharing” Case

Related Articles:

  1. Swedish Supreme Court Refuses Appeal In Pirate Bay Case
  2. “Innocent Infringement” Defense May Reach Supreme Court
  3. Supreme Court To Hear Aereo Case
  4. Supreme Court May Tune In To Music Download Case
  5. Supreme Court Declines Case On Making Online Retailers Collect Sales Taxes
blog comments powered by Disqus