Home > slashdot > Court Rules Against Woman Who Didn’t Like Search Results

Court Rules Against Woman Who Didn’t Like Search Results

October 4th, 2010 10:33 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

The Seventh Circuit Court has ruled that Beverly Stayart can’t sue Yahoo! because she did not like what she saw on the results page after searching for her name. Stayart claimed that her “internet presence” was damaged by Yahoo! because results for a search of her name showed listings which included pharmaceuticals and adult oriented websites. The court disagreed. From the article: “Stayart had sued under Section 43(a) of the federal Lanham Act, which prohibits false advertising, false implications of endorsement, and so on. Her problem was that a Lanham Act claim requires a showing that the plaintiff has a ‘commercial interest’ to protect, and Stayart did not have a commercial interest in her own name.”

Source: Court Rules Against Woman Who Didn’t Like Search Results

Related Articles:

  1. Australian Court Rules Google’s Search Ads OK
  2. German Federal Court Rules That Internet Connection Is Crucial To Everyday Life
  3. Court Rules Google’s Search Results Qualify As Free Speech
  4. Florida Supreme Court Rules Police Need Warrant To Search Cell Phones
  5. Australian Federal Court Rules For Patent Over Breast Cancer Gene
blog comments powered by Disqus
YOYOYOOYOYOYO