Home > lambdatheultimate > Joe Duffy: A (brief) retrospective on transactional memory

Joe Duffy: A (brief) retrospective on transactional memory

September 7th, 2010 09:05 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

A (brief) retrospective on transactional memory, by Joe Duffy, January 3rd, 2010. Although this is a blog post, don’t expect to read it all on your lunch break…

The STM.NET incubator project was canceled May 11, 2010, after beginning public life July 27, 2009 at DevLabs. In this blog post, written 4 months prior to its cancellation, Joe Duffy discusses the practical engineering challenges around implementing Software Transactional Memory in .NET. Note: He starts off with a disclaimer that he was not engaged in the STM.NET project past its initial working group phase.

In short, Joe argues, “Throughout, it became abundantly clear that TM, much like generics, was a systemic and platform-wide technology shift. It didn’t require type theory, but the road ahead sure wasn’t going to be easy.” The whole blog post deals with how many implementation challenges platform-wide support for STM would be in .NET, including what options were considered. He does not mention Maurice Herlihy’s SXM library approach, but refers to Tim Harris’s work several times.

There was plenty here that surprised me, especially when you compare Concurrent Haskell’s STM implementation to STM.NET design decisions and interesting debates the team had. In Concurrent Haskell, issues Joe raises, like making Console.WriteLine transactional, are delegated to the type system by the very nature of the TVar monad, preventing programmers from writing such wishywashy code. To be honest, this is why I didn’t understand what Joe meant by “it didn’t require type theory” gambit, since some of the design concerns are mediated in Concurrent Haskell via type theory. On the other hand, based on the pragmatics Joe discusses, and the platform-wide integration with the CLR they were shooting for, reminds me of The Transactional Memory / Garbage Collection Analogy. Joe also wrote a briefer follow-up post, More thoughts on transactional memory, where he talks more about Barbara Liskov’s Argus.

Source: Joe Duffy: A (brief) retrospective on transactional memory

Related Articles:

  1. Is Transactional Programming Actually Easier?
  2. Anatomy of Linux Kernel Shared Memory
  3. Retrospective Thoughts on BitC
  4. Apple Orders Memory Game Developers To Stop Using ‘Memory’ In Names
  5. Replacing Traditional Storage, Databases With In-Memory Analytics
blog comments powered by Disqus