Home > slashdot > FCC Dodges Pointed Questions On US Broadband Plan

FCC Dodges Pointed Questions On US Broadband Plan

July 10th, 2010 07:55 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Ars covers a series of questions that US senators put to the FCC chaiman following up on his appearance before the Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee in April. The headline question was a blunt one asked by octogenarian Senator Daniel Inouye (D-HI): “The National Broadband Plan (NBP) proposes a goal of having 100 million homes subscribed at 100Mbps by 2020,” he wrote, “while the leading nations already have 100Mbps fiber-based services at costs of $30 to $40 per month and beginning rollout of 1Gbps residential services, which the FCC suggests is required only for a single anchor institution in each community by 2020. This appears to suggest that the US should accept a 10- to 12-year lag behind the leading nations. What is the FCC’s rationale for a vision that appears to be firmly rooted in the second tier of countries?” In the FCC’s formal response (PDF), Chairman Genachowski doesn’t rise to the “second tier” bait, and in fact talks about “ensuring that America remains a broadband world leader,” as if he believes we currently are. A blogger over at Balloon Juice is a little more forthright on the “What is the FCC’s rationale” question: “The rationale is that this is the best they can do with a legislative branch in the pocket of telecom providers.”

Source: FCC Dodges Pointed Questions On US Broadband Plan

Related Articles:

  1. FCC’s New Broadband Plan Prioritizes Competition
  2. FCC’s Broadband Plan May Cost You Money
  3. WSJ’s Mossberg Calls For a Tougher Broadband Plan
  4. FCC Wants More Time To Craft Broadband Plan
  5. FCC Proposes 100Mbps Minimum Home Broadband Speed
blog comments powered by Disqus