Home > slashdot > Judicial Nominations In the Internet Age

Judicial Nominations In the Internet Age

May 16th, 2010 05:18 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

Hugh Pickens writes “Chris Good writes in the Atlantic that nominees to the Supreme Court and other high profile positions are required to provide the Judiciary Committee with everything they’ve ever written or said publicly, to the best of their abilities within reason. Thanks to the Internet, the last major judicial nominee reported out by the Senate Judiciary Committee, Ninth Circuit nominee Goodwin Liu, included links to YouTube videos of lectures and talks he gave, 573 pages of public writings, news articles about him, syllabi from courses he taught, and statements about legal issues. Even so, Liu was admonished for failing to fully disclose his writings and public speeches to Senators including appearances at such occasions as brown bag lunches and alumni gatherings. ‘In preparing my original submission, I made a good faith effort to track down all of my publications and speeches over the years,’ wrote Liu. ‘I checked my personal calendar, I performed a variety of electronic searches, and I searched my memory to produce the original list. But I have since realized that those efforts were not sufficient.’ Not so long ago, entire news articles in local papers could go wholly unnoticed, by both the nominee and committee members and staff but not so in the era of the internet. ‘Imagine what will happen when, decades from now, a president nominates someone to the Supreme Court who had access to Twitter, MySpace, and Facebook at the age of 15.’”

Source: Judicial Nominations In the Internet Age

Related Articles:

  1. Ask Slashdot: How To Become Informed In Judicial Elections?
  2. New Jersey Supreme Court Restricts Police Searches of Phone Data
  3. Israel’s Supreme Court Says Yes To Internet Anonymity
  4. Facebook: The Internet’s Most Searched & Visited Site Of 2011
  5. Cell Phone Searches Require Warrant
blog comments powered by Disqus