Home > slashdot > A Skeptical Comparison of HTML5 Video Playback To Flash

A Skeptical Comparison of HTML5 Video Playback To Flash

March 14th, 2010 03:03 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

gollum123 writes “Think we’d all be better off if HTML5 could somehow instantly replace Flash overnight? Not necessarily, according to a set of comparisons from Jan Ozer of the Streaming Learning Center website, which found that while HTML5 did come out ahead in many respects, it wasn’t exactly a clear winner. They did find that HTML5 clearly performed better than Flash 10 or 10.1 in Safari on a Mac, although the differences were less clear cut in Google Chrome or Firefox. On the other hand, Flash more than held its own on Windows, and Flash Player 10.1 was actually 58% more efficient than HTML5 in Google Chrome on the Windows system tested. As you may have deduced, one of the big factors accounting for that discrepancy is that Flash is able to take advantage of GPU hardware acceleration in Windows, while Adobe is effectively cut out of the loop on Mac.”

gollum123 also links to additional tests indicating that Flash “does not perform consistently worse on Mac than on Windows.”

Source: A Skeptical Comparison of HTML5 Video Playback To Flash

Related Articles:

  1. YouTube Ditches Flash For HTML5 Video By Default
  2. Open-Source JavaScript Flash Player (HTML5/SVG)
  3. Vimeo Also Introduces HTML5 Video Player
  4. Adobe Releases Its Own HTML5 Video Player
  5. HTML5 vs. Flash — the Case For Flash
blog comments powered by Disqus
YOYOYOOYOYOYO