Home > slashdot > Australian Judge Rules Facts Cannot Be Copyrighted

Australian Judge Rules Facts Cannot Be Copyrighted

February 14th, 2010 02:32 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

nfarrell writes “Last week, an Australian Judge ruled that copyright laws do not apply to collections of facts, regardless of the amount of effort that was spent collecting them. In this case, the case surrounded the reproduction of entries from the White and Yellow Pages, but the ruling referred to a previous case involving IceTV, which republishes TV guides. Does this mean that other databases of facts, such as financial data, are also legally able to be copied and redistributed?” Here are analyses from a former legal adviser to the directory publisher which prevailed as the defendant in this case, and from Smart Company.

Source: Australian Judge Rules Facts Cannot Be Copyrighted

Related Articles:

  1. Judge Rules API’s Can Not Be Copyrighted
  2. US Federal Judge Rules NSA Data Collection Legal
  3. Judge Koh Rules: Samsung Did Not Willfully Infringe
  4. Judge Koh Rules: Samsung Did Not Willfully Infringe
  5. Judge Koh Rules: Samsung Did Not Willfully Infringe
blog comments powered by Disqus