Home > slashdot > Does Cheap Tech Undermine Legal Privacy Protections?

Does Cheap Tech Undermine Legal Privacy Protections?

January 5th, 2010 01:44 admin Leave a comment Go to comments

bfwebster writes “Orin Kerr, a George Washington University law professor who focuses on legal issues regarding information technology (I own a copy of his book “Computer Crime Law”) raises an interesting issue about a 2001 Supreme Court decision (Kyllo v. United States) that prohibited police from using a thermal imaging device on a private home without a warrant. (The police were trying to detect excess heat coming from the roof of a garage, as an indication of lamps being used to grow marijuana inside.) The Court made its decision back in 2001 because thermal imaging devices were ‘not in general use’ and therefore represented a technology that required a warrant. However, Kerr points out that anyone can now buy such thermal imaging devices for $50 to $150 from Amazon, and that they’re advertised as a means of detecting thermal leakage from your home. In light of that, Kerr asks, is the Supreme Court’s ruling still sound?”

Source: Does Cheap Tech Undermine Legal Privacy Protections?

Related Articles:

  1. Supreme Court Hearing Case On Drug-Sniffing Dog “Fishing Expeditions”
  2. GPS Tracking Without a Warrant Declared Legal
  3. EFF Urges Court To Protect Privacy of Text Messages
  4. Cellphone Privacy In Canada: Encryption Triggers Need For Warrant
  5. Drones, Dogs and the Future of Privacy
blog comments powered by Disqus