Home > slashdot > Federal Judge Says E-mail Not Protected By 4th Amendment

Federal Judge Says E-mail Not Protected By 4th Amendment

October 29th, 2009 10:58 admin

DustyShadow writes “In the case In re United States, Judge Mosman ruled that there is no constitutional requirement of notice to the account holder because the Fourth Amendment does not apply to e-mails under the third-party doctrine. ‘When a person uses the Internet, the user’s actions are no longer in his or her physical home; in fact he or she is not truly acting in private space at all. The user is generally accessing the Internet with a network account and computer storage owned by an ISP like Comcast or NetZero. All materials stored online, whether they are e-mails or remotely stored documents, are physically stored on servers owned by an ISP. When we send an e-mail or instant message from the comfort of our own homes to a friend across town the message travels from our computer to computers owned by a third party, the ISP, before being delivered to the intended recipient. Thus, “private” information is actually being held by third-party private companies.”"

Related Articles:

  1. Using Fourth-Party Data Brokers To Bypass the Fourth Amendment
  2. Legal Motion: Hyperlinks Are Protected By the First Amendment
  3. Ask Slashdot: Is There a War Against Small Mail Servers?
  4. Palin’s E-Mail Hacker Imprisoned Against Judge’s Wishes
  5. 11th Circuit Eliminates 4th Amend. In E-mail
Comments are closed.